Neama Rahmani

“In cases where you have the government taking on a duty, that tends to be better than simply arguing that the government has a duty to protect everyone because we know that murders happen all the time, and you can't sue the government just because someone is killed.”

Neama Rahmani · said date not stated · reported 2026-09-19

Rahmani explained that cases where the government takes on a specific duty are stronger than simply arguing the government has a general duty to protect everyone.

“That means they're gonna argue that they assume the responsibility to make sure Charlie Kirk was safe, and they failed to do so,”

Neama Rahmani · said date not stated · reported 2026-09-19

Rahmani suggested the Kirk family would argue that UVU assumed responsibility for Charlie Kirk's safety by acknowledging security concerns and then failed to fulfill that duty.

“They are tough because you are trying to hold the police or city, county or state responsible for someone else's criminal actions.”

Neama Rahmani · said date not stated · reported 2026-09-19

Rahmani explained that lack of security cases against the government are difficult because they involve holding government entities responsible for someone else's criminal actions.

“I've handled lack of security cases, including lack of security cases against the government,”

Neama Rahmani · said date not stated · reported 2026-09-19

Rahmani told Fox News Digital he has handled lack of security cases, including cases against the government.