Gail Curley

“unable to identify a person responsible by a preponderance of the evidence.”

Gail Curley · said date not stated · reported 2026-11-05

The Supreme Court announced in January 2023 that Marshal Gail Curley's investigation was unable to identify the leaker by a preponderance of the evidence.

“No one confessed to publicly disclosing the document and none of the available forensic and other evidence provided a basis for identifying any individual as the source of the document,”

Gail Curley · said date not stated · reported 2026-11-05

The marshal's report concluded that no one confessed and no forensic evidence identified the source of the leaked draft.